Health Insurance Industry
Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Massachusetts offers a variety of health care options for a family of three or four. The cheapest is a PPO at a monthly cost of $1202.19. The cost translates into the neighborhood of $300.55 a week. The Boston Globe recently reported Mr. Cleve Killingsworth, the CEO of Blue Ghastly of MA; enjoyed an annual salary for 2007 of 3.5 million, or, $67,307.69 a week. It would lift in the neighborhood of 224 families paying weekly premiums of $300 unbiased to mask the cost of one employee of Blue Rotten Blue Shield of MA. Needless to say, not a penny of these 224 families hard earned money applies to healthcare, although in all fairness to the insurance industry, this is indeed a healthcare cost.
This week of Mid-October 2009, the health care industry is embarking on a campaign designed to extinguish any disaster to nationalize heath care reform in the United States. The health care industry is insisting any nationalized idea will raise the cost of monthly premiums by thousands of dollars and the health care industry may be apt, but for those who can’t afford health care as it now stands, increased costs don’t mean anything. Simple economics dictates if the designate goes up on something you can’t afford to open with, purchasing the item remains out of the quiz. If, however, you have the purchasing power for such an item, the last thing you want is an increase in its impress. So, is the health industry campaigning to protect those subscribers they already have, or, trying to protect CEO’s who create $67,307.69 a week?
CEO’s like Mr. Killingsworth are actually in very downhearted positions. Owned by companies that offer stocks to investors and controlled by boards of directors demanding increased returns on those investments, Mr. Killingworth is caught between satisfying those in a residence to support him of a very cozy job and the publics perception of a health insurers responsibility to Americans, insured with the company, or, not insured at all. It must be quite a balancing act, especially in times when a President demands coverage for all Americans.
Americans are fortunate with respect to the fact we can decide between public schools and private schools. Those who can afford to send their children to private schools do and those that cannot utilize public schools. A public health option is not going to kill health insurance, as we know it. Those with private policies will hold them and those with no policies can flock to public offerings. Will they be as expedient as those services provided in the private sector? Probably not, but the burden the uninsured status on the health industry as a whole will lead to a rising cost of premiums, affordable to less and less of the public. When was the last time you paid less for health insurance?
When John Doe dials 911 because he is suffering a heart attack, emergency operators don’t waist time querying the caller about his insurance coverage. Emergency operators ascertain the dwelling of the individual and dispatch EMTs to the status. EMTs fight to sustain life while transporting to a hospital. If John Doe is insured, everyone (with the possible exception of the insurance company) breathes a affirm of relief. If he is not, he is a burden on society. He becomes a social cost. 911 operators as well as the Emergency Medical Techs they dispatch, operate at a cost to society. They like salaries and benefits dependent upon tax revenues. A nation of insured individuals will terminate the growing loss of funds related to the health industry at gigantic. Public hospitals cannot rush at zero profit. Uninsured people don’t do regular check-ups giving diseases every opportunity to grow and attack society as a whole. There is no reason to anxiety a change in the plan we insure our neighbors. As it stands, the health insurance industry is headed down a road of self-destruction in a futile attempt at self-preservation. Boards of Directors clinging to terrified profits and CEO’s trying to explain a weekly income matching the weekly premiums of how many families? Affordable health care for all, could translate into health industry profit and growth. If it doesn’t, then shame on us for attempting to fix a dilemma, but that is what American’s do. They perform every distress to improve. Most of the time we actually succeed. Sometimes, we fail along the draw but in the slay the only method out of this mess is to change it. Give the nay-sayers the opportunity to say, “I told you so.” Maybe that’s what it’ll assume for us to stand united and fix this thing, after all.
Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Massachusetts offers a variety of health care options for a family of three or four. The cheapest is a PPO at a monthly cost of $1202.19. The cost translates into the neighborhood of $300.55 a week. The Boston Globe recently reported Mr. Cleve Killingsworth, the CEO of Blue Tainted of MA; enjoyed an annual salary for 2007 of 3.5 million, or, $67,307.69 a week. It would grasp in the neighborhood of 224 families paying weekly premiums of $300 unbiased to shroud the cost of one employee of Blue Rotten Blue Shield of MA. Needless to say, not a penny of these 224 families hard earned money applies to healthcare, although in all fairness to the insurance industry, this is indeed a healthcare cost.
This week of Mid-October 2009, the health care industry is embarking on a campaign designed to demolish any trouble to nationalize heath care reform in the United States. The health care industry is insisting any nationalized notion will raise the cost of monthly premiums by thousands of dollars and the health care industry may be true, but for those who can’t afford health care as it now stands, increased costs don’t mean anything. Simple economics dictates if the imprint goes up on something you can’t afford to start with, purchasing the item remains out of the ask. If, however, you have the purchasing power for such an item, the last thing you want is an increase in its note. So, is the health industry campaigning to protect those subscribers they already have, or, trying to protect CEO’s who develop $67,307.69 a week?
CEO’s like Mr. Killingsworth are actually in very downhearted positions. Owned by companies that offer stocks to investors and controlled by boards of directors demanding increased returns on those investments, Mr. Killingworth is caught between satisfying those in a site to support him of a very cozy job and the publics perception of a health insurers responsibility to Americans, insured with the company, or, not insured at all. It must be quite a balancing act, especially in times when a President demands coverage for all Americans.
Americans are fortunate with respect to the fact we can decide between public schools and private schools. Those who can afford to send their children to private schools do and those that cannot exercise public schools. A public health option is not going to raze health insurance, as we know it. Those with private policies will retain them and those with no policies can flock to public offerings. Will they be as wonderful as those services provided in the private sector? Probably not, but the burden the uninsured state on the health industry as a whole will lead to a rising cost of premiums, affordable to less and less of the public. When was the last time you paid less for health insurance?
When John Doe dials 911 because he is suffering a heart attack, emergency operators don’t waist time querying the caller about his insurance coverage. Emergency operators ascertain the station of the individual and dispatch EMTs to the spot. EMTs fight to withhold life while transporting to a hospital. If John Doe is insured, everyone (with the possible exception of the insurance company) breathes a converse of relief. If he is not, he is a burden on society. He becomes a social cost. 911 operators as well as the Emergency Medical Techs they dispatch, operate at a cost to society. They luxuriate in salaries and benefits dependent upon tax revenues. A nation of insured individuals will finish the growing loss of funds related to the health industry at ample. Public hospitals cannot hasten at zero profit. Uninsured people don’t do regular check-ups giving diseases every opportunity to grow and attack society as a whole. There is no reason to horror a change in the blueprint we insure our neighbors. As it stands, the health insurance industry is headed down a road of self-destruction in a futile attempt at self-preservation. Boards of Directors clinging to apprehensive profits and CEO’s trying to clarify a weekly income matching the weekly premiums of how many families? Affordable health care for all, could translate into health industry profit and growth. If it doesn’t, then shame on us for attempting to fix a predicament, but that is what American’s do. They effect every trouble to improve. Most of the time we actually succeed. Sometimes, we fail along the draw but in the demolish the only procedure out of this mess is to change it. Give the nay-sayers the opportunity to say, “I told you so.” Maybe that’s what it’ll lift for us to stand united and fix this thing, after all.